One debate comforted the world. The other frightened it.

The article “One debate comforted the world. The other frightened it." was written by the editorial board for people who are going to be voting soon. The editorial board focuses on national politics, specializes in education, district affairs, energy, the environment, public health and other federal policy, concentrates on economic policy, trade, and write political, etc. The argument is that the board opposed Trump and thought Trump is not a good politician because he is a businessman and lacks political knowledge. The USA would be a mess in the future if Trump wins for president.

Trump’s politics are very ignorant. He thinks America can’t defend Japan because Japan does not pay the U.S. In fact, Japan pays $4 billion to America each year. The NATO alliance is not paid close attention to because Trump does not do more to learn about NATO and he ignores NATO’s treaties. Trump suggests that the administration would not continue the NATO alliance because he thinks the alliance is not important and won’t pay attention to the alliance. Trump’s misstatement is that he declares the U.S. should have taken the oil from Iraq and that oil is ISIS’s primary source of survival. In truth, their primary source of oil is from Syria. Trump’s assertions sometimes have serious implications. In comparison, Clinton keeps contacting Japan, NATO, and South Korea to reassure them about the defense treaties.

I think the board’s opinion is evident. They worry that if many people support Trump, America maybe would be impeded in diplomatic relation because Trump lacks political knowledge about foreign affairs. The relationship between Trump and the alliance would be broken up. If Trump wins president, he as a businessman would be always surprising and frightening for America.